Evaluating and integrating third-party KYC providers: Onfido, Jumio, Veriff, and building orchestration layers.
The build vs. buy decision for KYC depends on volume, document types, regulatory requirements, and competitive differentiation. Most companies benefit from integrating specialized providers (Onfido, Jumio, Veriff, Sumsub) for core verification while building custom orchestration, risk scoring, and user experience layers.
The KYC vendor landscape includes dozens of providers with different specializations.
Full-stack verification providers: - Onfido: Strong document + biometric, good developer experience - Jumio: Enterprise-focused, comprehensive coverage - Veriff: Video-based verification, strong accuracy - Sumsub: Good value, strong in crypto/gaming - IDnow: Strong in European markets
Specialized providers: - Plaid: Bank account verification, income verification - Socure: Identity graphing, predictive analytics - Sardine: Device intelligence, behavioral biometrics - Persona: Workflow builder, good UX
Data providers: - LexisNexis: Identity data, fraud databases - Experian/Equifax: Credit bureau data, identity verification - World-Check (Refinitiv): Sanctions and watchlist screening
Choose providers based on your specific needs: geography coverage, document types, volume pricing, accuracy requirements.
Selecting the right KYC provider requires evaluating multiple dimensions.
Accuracy: - Document verification accuracy by type - Biometric matching accuracy - Liveness detection effectiveness - Fraud detection rates
Coverage: - Countries and document types supported - Language support - Regulatory certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001)
Integration: - API design and documentation - SDK quality (mobile, web) - Webhook reliability - Sandbox environment quality
Operational: - Processing speed (real-time vs batch) - Uptime and reliability - Support quality and responsiveness - Compliance and audit support
Commercial: - Pricing model (per verification, tiered) - Minimum commitments - Contract flexibility - Total cost at your expected volume
Run pilots with multiple providers using your actual user base. Published accuracy numbers often don't reflect real-world performance on your specific document types and user demographics.
Design your integration architecture for flexibility and resilience.
Direct integration (single provider): - Simplest implementation - Vendor lock-in risk - Limited fallback options
Orchestration layer (recommended): - Abstract provider behind your own API - Easy to switch or add providers - Custom logic for routing and fallback - Unified data model
Multi-provider strategies: - Primary + fallback: Use secondary provider when primary fails - Best-of-breed: Different providers for different capabilities - Geographic routing: Different providers for different regions - A/B testing: Compare provider performance
Orchestration layer components: - Request routing logic - Response normalization - Error handling and retry - Fallback provider selection - Result caching (where appropriate) - Audit logging
Building an orchestration layer is more work upfront but provides significant flexibility as your needs evolve.
Not every KYC component should be built or bought. Use this framework.
Typically buy (integrate providers): - Document OCR and authenticity detection - Facial recognition algorithms - Liveness detection models - Sanctions/watchlist screening - Global document coverage
Typically build (custom): - User experience and verification flows - Risk scoring and decision engine - Provider orchestration - Case management and manual review - Analytics and compliance reporting
Decision factors: - Volume: High volume justifies custom investment - Differentiation: Build where you compete, buy commodities - Expertise: Do you have ML/CV talent to build and maintain? - Speed: Buying is faster to market - Control: Building gives more flexibility
Hybrid approach (most common): Integrate providers for core verification capabilities. Build custom orchestration, UX, and decision logic. This balances speed-to-market with long-term flexibility.
Managing KYC vendor relationships requires ongoing attention.
Contract considerations: - Volume commitments vs flexibility - Price escalation clauses - Data ownership and retention - Exit provisions and data portability - SLA definitions and penalties
Operational management: - Monitor accuracy and performance continuously - Track costs against budget - Regular business reviews - Stay informed of product updates - Benchmark against alternatives periodically
Risk mitigation: - Avoid single points of failure - Maintain ability to switch providers - Keep integration abstracted - Document data flows for compliance - Regular security assessments
Relationship development: - Engage with customer success - Participate in beta programs - Provide feedback on product direction - Negotiate based on partnership value
The KYC market is competitive. Use that to your advantage in negotiations while building genuine partnerships with providers who understand your needs.
Based in Bangalore, we help fintech companies, neobanks, and regulated businesses across India build KYC systems that balance compliance with conversion.
We design verification flows that adapt to risk—streamlined for low-risk users, rigorous for high-risk scenarios—optimizing both conversion and fraud prevention.
We integrate best-in-class providers like Onfido, Jumio, and Veriff while building custom orchestration layers that give you control.
We build with GDPR, AML, and local regulations in mind from day one, with proper audit trails and data handling practices.
Share your project details and we'll get back to you within 24 hours with a free consultation—no commitment required.
Boolean and Beyond
825/90, 13th Cross, 3rd Main
Mahalaxmi Layout, Bengaluru - 560086
590, Diwan Bahadur Rd
Near Savitha Hall, R.S. Puram
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641002